THIRTY FIRST DIALOGUE

January 28, 1999

Peter: First of all, I feel a need to apologize to You, to Dan and to Rosemarie for my state of mind and for my reaction yesterday toward Dan’s and Rosemarie’s questions. At the time, I felt that I needed to get it off my chest.

The Lord Jesus Christ: It was appropriate to get it off your chest, Peter. Otherwise, you would keep it within you, by which state you would be giving a much greater and much more damaging opportunity to the group of the negative entities assigned to you for that purpose, to completely shut you off from our dialogs and cause you unnecessary mental anguish. In that case, you would escape into your solitude, as you like to do on such occasions, effectively closing the door to your state of inwardness, and ceasing to communicate with your friends both in this world and in your world. You see, Peter, this is exactly what those negative entities would like to accomplish with you. Unless you talk about what you feel in this respect, specifically as related to the issues of My New Revelation and these Dialogs, they would succeed in blocking you for a long period of time. We don’t want this to happen, by any means. As you used to say to your professional students, ‘a normal reaction in an abnormal condition is abnormal,’ meaning, that it is normal to react to an abnormal condition in an abnormal way.

In our case, a serious problem was looming over you, related to a possible discrepancy, or even contradiction, between what was conveyed to you in The New Revelation of The Lord Jesus Christ and in these Dialogs. If that were the case, if such contradiction were to really exist, of course, you would panic because you would immediately assume that either the statements in the Big Book were not from Me or that the dialogs are not with Me. Can you imagine the consequences of that if it were true? It would be devastating for you and for everyone else who has accepted My New Revelation as My True Word.

On the other hand, look at what would happen if your reaction would be something like ‘so what, big deal, I am not going to worry about it. Let them resolve this problem without my bothering about it. I am not going to waste my time on questioning or checking the verity of this statement. I’ll just continue as if nothing happened.’ In this case, you would effectively succumb to spiritual arrogance and as a result, you would instantly fall under the influence of that negative group assigned to you for that purpose.

Thus, it is very important that everything being said and recorded during our dialogs, as well as during any other of our interactions, is accompanied by a simultaneous continuous check in order to assure the verity, authenticity and genuineness of its source. And not only that, but that every respective reader of these Dialogs does the same thing through his/her intuition. It is every reader’s spiritual responsibility to do so.

If you look, Peter, on the outcome of yesterday’s event, you can see very clearly how important it was to bring the issue of a possible contradiction and discrepancy to your attention. It allowed for a very crucial, multiversally important clarification and explanation to be offered for everyone involved at all levels and in all dimensions. What was stated in the Thirtieth Dialog put everything into proper perspective, in essence, nullifying any doubts about the possibility of contradiction and discrepancy. And not only that, but it clearly delineated the absolute necessity of having infinite varieties of choices in order to assure everyone that whatever they choose would be the right choice to make, because every other choice would not lead to the same most desirable, logical and reasonable outcome.

I can tell you very clearly, Peter, that because all sentient entities, no matter where they are situated, no matter how far they have spiritually developed, are not absolute but relative, and even they need occasional reminders of this nature. This is not only humans’ prerogative. Of course, being what humans are, they are almost in a constant need of being reminded about everything, and especially about spiritual issues.

So, there are questions and then there are other questions. To clarify: The questions, as posed yesterday by Dan and Rosemarie, have multiversal significance. They need a response which would include and satisfy everyone and not only humans, or in this case, Dan, Rosemarie or you, Peter. Because of the nature and magnitude of their meaning, they have to be answered through you, Peter. After all, you are the one who is recording and conveying them to all interested parties. For that reason, it is only logical and proper that you take responsibility for answering them.

On the other hand, for example, take a question posed three days ago about the relationship that may exist between you and your employer. Is it proper to use the time and resources of your employer for your own personal, private needs, unrelated to your assigned job? Now, these kinds of questions don’t fall into the above mentioned category of multiversal meaning. It is something which is between you and your employer, as well as between Me and you. Different situations, different employers, different agreements and different possibilities exist which have a totally different connotation from one case to another, depending on the adopted policies of the respective employer. The spiritual significance of your behavior, while you are in your place of employment, is totally individualized and personalized so that only you can answer that question through your own discernment and intuition and direct communication with Me — by whatever mode is available to you. Because of this factor, questions of this type cannot be answered through you, or anyone else for that matter, but only through the inquirer himself/herself.

This is the reason why it was emphasized so many times how important it is for every one of you to learn to ask your own questions and get your own answers, by whatever mode is available to you, and not to rely on you, Peter, or anyone else. We don’t want anyone to be dependent on what you say, Peter, or what I say through you, because it would end up in the total passivity of the inquirer and his/her spiritual impotence, as well as shunning the responsibility that he/she has in this respect. To end up like that means to become subsumed by the negative state. Only questions related to the issues of My New Revelation and to the content of these Dialogs, as well as questions that have multiversal significance, are proper and need to be answered through you, Peter, because it is your role and assignment to do so. In previous Dialogs we have already explained why this is so.

Peter: Talking about questions, how do You like a comment made this morning by Dr. Ardyth Norem of Arizona in her E-mail about my addressing You as ‘Sir?’ She feels that, perhaps, by addressing You as ‘Sir,’ I neglected the feminine aspects of Your nature by emphasizing instead Your masculine aspect. Of course, on my part, the way I felt it at the time, it was more of a habitual response as though I was talking to my male superior who is well above me in a typically human connotation. No disrespect or intent to de-emphasize Your feminine aspect even remotely entered my mind when I called You that.

The Lord Jesus Christ: Although it is true that from your personal standpoint it was a kind of habitual response, in reality, in the true reality, the reason you were almost compelled to address Me like that was because, first of all, it was like one man talking to another man; and, secondly, the connotation within which it occurred required you to perceive Me as your Heavenly Father. At the same time, the logical and intellectual discourse of the Dialogs made it more comfortable for you to address Me as ‘Sir,’ because it is of My typical Absolute Masculinity’s Nature. However, let it be known to everyone, that in the process of this discourse, the Absolute Equalization of My Absolute Masculinity and My Absolute Femininity has always been and always will be in place, no matter in what manner I am addressed. This is also true regarding how I am perceived in your mind, Peter.

So, no offense to Ardyth, and it is good that she reminded you of this fact; although I can assure her that in your mind, Peter, there has never been any inclination, desire or tendency of neglecting or putting down or seeing the feminine aspects as less valuable or less important than the masculine aspects. The opposite is true: I can attest to it that you, Peter, were very progressive in this respect many years back (46 years ago), while still confined in the former Soviet Union. Do you remember what you wrote in your personal philosophical diary, which was seized by the KGB — the Soviet Secret Agency? With tremendous passion you proclaimed and defended the issue of total equalization for men and women, and how equally valuable and needed they are, and how one gender shouldn’t ever be put over the other. And do you remember, Peter, how during your trial those passages were read and how three judges in the tribunal — all male, of course — ridiculed you in that you could come up with such a foolish notion? Only a recording secretary, who was female, in a very shy and trembling voice, quipped in your defense on that issue. As you know, in those days, no one ever questioned the so-called superiority of males over females. So, even in this respect, you were well ahead of your time, Peter.

Peter: Anyway, Ardyth is right, and I, most certainly will be more careful from now on. At this point, would You like to address some other issues as indicated to me during my early morning walks, meditation and dialogs with You?

The Lord Jesus Christ: Yes, Peter. The issue that needs to be further addressed today relates to the concepts of predictions and possibilities.

A tendency exists in human nature, and in the nature of the negative state in general, to perceive everything as permanently fixed, unmodifiable and unchangeable. We are reiterating this issue here because it needs to be reminded in order to avoid any possible negative reactions if things don’t happen the way everyone expects them to happen because they were either predicted or implied. So, don’t complain about redundancy or repetition in this respect.

Take for example, the biblical predictions by prophets in the Old Testament and by the Apocalypse in the New Testament, as well as some of My own predictions as recorded, for example, in The Gospel According to Matthew, Chapters 24-25 and elsewhere. Whoever reads them takes it for granted that they will be literally fulfilled at some time or another on your planet and nowhere else. After all, if God — Me, predicts something, it has to be that way no matter what, as though God — Me, were unable to change His/Her or Her/His mind, and consistently, without any regard for anyone or anything, follows through with whatever He/She predicted or ordained. My disciples, for example, were so sure that everything I said, predicted or designated would come true during their life on planet Zero, that when they came to the spiritual world and realized their error in this matter, as well as in many other matters, they were shocked out of their wits, so-to-speak, and it took them some time to adjust to the fact that things are not always what they seem to be.

In that case, you may ask, why would you want to make any predictions through anyone? The importance of those biblical or similar predictions of the past, is in their function and not as much in what they contain or say. They were meant as warnings in order to give a chance to all involved to amend their ways, to recognize the necessity for change and to establish a different mode of life which would make it possible to avoid or entirely nullify the need for predictions to come true.

As you know from previous statements, each behavior or choice that one makes for an established lifestyle, by the spiritual laws, bears its consequences, results and outcomes. By the Absolute Law of My Absolute Unconditional Mercy and Forgiveness, it is necessary, first of all, to delineate all possible results of any behavior or choice and, at the same time, to give various different alternatives for the different behaviors or choices that could be taken in order to avoid or entirely nullify anything that was contained in such predictions. This is the way it is, period. This is the way things are set up in the entire being and existence and pseudo-being and pseudo-existence.

So, in this sense, you do have to look at any predictions as possibilities which may or may not come true, depending on the alternative choices that could be taken by those who are being addressed, or to whom such predictions are being addressed. This is one of the most important reasons why in My New Revelation (as in its Chapter 7, for example) such predictive or foresightful statements are always accompanied by the statement that this is one the many possible scenarios of how things could happen and that there are many other possibilities in which such things can be manifested or appear. Therefore, based on this factor, never, ever cling to only one of the possibilities that are being offered to you only as an example of how things might happen and not whether they will happen exactly the way they are being described. They may or may not happen that way.

As you said some time ago, Peter, if something is being given to you as an example of how things will happen, in our particular case, of how the ending of the negative state will happen, you suspect that it will not happen that way. By the multiversal factor of it being said that it will happen that way, in the non-spatial and non-temporal state and continuum, it is already being fulfilled. If it is being fulfilled in some way or another, and placed into the Universality-Of-It-All, then it is obvious that some other scenario or choice is being considered which hasn’t taken place yet. You have to understand a very important rule here, which will be very difficult to grasp by the human aspect of your mind: Any time something is being conveyed to you in the form of predictions or foresights, and such predictions or foresights are accompanied by a descriptive example of how it could happen, by the factor of it being uttered, in the non-spatial and non-temporal dimension it really happens that way. As I said, this statement will be very difficult for you to conceive.

On the other hand, what you do have to realize clearly, and this is something that eluded even My own disciples while they still lived on planet Zero after My departure, is that whenever statements of this nature are made, they relate to a multidimensional state of affairs and very rarely do they have any physical external relevance to anything on planet Zero. Usually, the impact on planet Zero doesn’t happen that much on the physical level but more on the mind level of humans and their lifestyle. So, the impact is spiritual and mental in nature rather than physical and external. The physical and external aspects may change as a consequence of the spiritual and mental changes but they always lag behind — sometimes even for millennia.

As you know, unfortunately for humans, their external conscious mind was completely disconnected from all other levels of their mind, especially and particularly from their spiritual level. For that reason, they are unable to perceive any events, occurrences or the state of affairs of all other levels and dimensions of the multiverse. Yet, by the various aspects of their multileveled mind, they are connected to all of them without consciously realizing that such is the case. And not only that, but they fully participate in all events in other dimensions without having even the slightest suspicion that this is the case. The reason for this unawareness is rooted in the fact that it was necessary to disconnect their external human conscious mind from having any link both to the other levels of their mind and to other dimensions as well.

As mentioned several times before, this was done for the purpose of placing humans into a position of freedom of choice, so that the necessity to be negative by imposition from the forces of the negative state would be nullified. Instead, they may choose to be that way, or any other way, by their own free will and choice. If the link from their human conscious mind to everything and everyone else were to be left intact, being that humans are structured to be inherently dependent on someone or something else, they would be under the constant influence of others, from the other dimensions, who, in their view, have far more superior knowledge and ability than they do. So, humans would do whatever they would be told to do and not what they would want to do by their own freedom of choice. In that case however, nothing of their doings or deeds could be appropriated or attributed to them because, ultimately, these would not be theirs. In that case, humans would forever stay impotent to make their own choices by their own free will.

Should something like that happen, the negative state could never be eliminated because somebody out there — humans — would not be in the position to make any choices on their own. Due to the fact that the nature of the negative state is rooted in the life of impositions, you would have to entirely eliminate humans from any modes of life, without the possibility of saving them in order to bring the negative state to its eternal end. As long as there is any life by impositions, the negative state thrives and expands. This is one of the main reasons why it was necessary to sever the human external mind’s connection to everyone and everything else in other dimensions. As you know, this was primarily accomplished during My First Coming. As you remember, before that time, humans were able to see beings from other dimensions walking among them.

And this brings us to another possibility of how things would be arranged, should the choice be made that neither the pseudo-creators nor the renegades would physically appear on planet Zero. Once it is perceived that humans are firmly embedded and rooted in the life of their freedom of choice, you gradually and slowly, so as to avoid dangerous shock, reestablish the connection of their external conscious mind with the rest of their mind and with all other dimensions, by building a permanent straight line to all of them. In this new condition they would be able to not only perceive everything that is going on there but they would be able to actively communicate with all their respective inhabitants. Thus, a physical connection would be established with other worlds, and planet Zero would become engulfed in their sphere. In that case, humans could observe and learn how the pseudo-creators, renegades and their respective minions did what they did; how the activation of the negative state happened; how they were fabricated; who their actual ‘creators’ were; and all other things related to this issue.

The pseudo-creators would come to humans in this particular mode, reveal themselves to humans, convince them that they are the only creators and gods, etc., without an actual physical appearance on planet Zero. However, because now planet Zero and the human external conscious mind would also be engulfed in the sphere of other dimensions, by that factor, they would be able to fully participate in the final phase of the second coming of the pseudo-creators. Following that, by the same mode, they would be fully participating in the final phase of My Second Coming. Thus, all factors would be in place for the fulfillment of all requirements for the ending of the negative state as depicted, for example, in Chapter 7 of The New Revelation of The Lord Jesus Christ. Do you see, Peter, and all of you who read these words, how it would be possible to accomplish everything which needs to be accomplished in this respect? And how it is possible to have many different scenarios without violating or refuting any requirements for this to happen? And I gave only two examples: one yesterday and one in this Dialog. I can assure you many others are possible. But for now, these are sufficient for your proper understanding of this issue. For that reason, I would recommend to finish for today with the wishes for you to have a very pleasant day.

Peter: Thank You very much for Your clarifications. I enjoyed them very much.

Source: DIALOGUES WITH THE LORD JESUS ​​CHRIST PART 1.

INTRODUCTION | SPIRITUALITY | CONTACTS | MAIN SITEMAP | BACK