To read aloud

NINETY FIRST DIALOGUE

July 22, 1999, Brno, the Czech Republic


Peter: Good morning from Brno, Moravia in the Czech Republic, my Lord Jesus Christ and everyone present.

The Lord Jesus Christ: Good morning to you, Peter, from all of us present.

Peter: Basically, I am checking in formally, so-to-speak, to see if there is anything that would be timely to reveal or to discuss or elaborate upon. However, I do have something on my mind related to the nature of the pseudo-creators after they became the pseudo-creators and established themselves as such. Of course, as always, before going into my own question, I am humbly asking whether You have anything to bring to our attention at this time.

The Lord Jesus Christ: Thank you, Peter, for your kind offer. At this time, although I do have some issues that need to be discussed, it would be somewhat premature to do so due to the fact that you have not yet finished your mission in the Czech and Slovak Republics and you still have several meetings to attend with My representatives, situated in those two Republics, who are such either actually or potentially. Certain things and events need to occur in order to complete and close the one crucial and important phase of the currently ongoing shift which relates to your visit in Europe, Peter, before anything could be revealed in this respect. So, be patient and continue in your meetings with My people everywhere you go. For that reason, I would now recommend that you go ahead and ask your question.

Peter: As I was rereading some chapters in The New Revelation of The Lord Jesus Christ, and thinking about other books of Your New Revelation, in which the issue of the nature of the pseudo-creators was raised, it occurred to me that, perhaps some discrepancy may exist between how the pseudo-creators were perceived or described in those books and how they are perceived and how we relate to them at the present time. As You know, in those books, the pseudo-creators were portrayed as the most evil, vicious, cunning, despicable, negative and putrid creatures who had nothing more in their mind than to take over the entire positive state and to destroy You and Your Government. However, for the first time in the Corollaries…, as well as in these Dialogs, they don’t seem to be portrayed that way anymore. Instead, they are perceived as someone who, in essence, is in search of the Absolute Truth. Any comments on this seeming discrepancy?

The Lord Jesus Christ: I would like to comment on this issue gladly, Peter. It is a good question and it needs to be elaborated upon. In some way, it has a direct relevance to the issues discussed in the Eighty Ninth and Ninetieth Dialogs. As you remember, Peter, in those Dialogs a transcending understanding was offered to you and to all of you who read these Dialogs, on the absolute need to activate and put into dominance the pseudo-life of the negative state.

Let us look on this issue closer. Once again we are facing here the problem of relationship or relatedness to and understanding of the Absolute and all relatives to this Absolute.

As you remember from the aforementioned two Dialogs, from the position of the relatives, the knowledge of the Absolute, in its Absolute State and Process, is not possible in an absolute sense. And yet, in the state and condition of relativity of the sentient mind, there is a tendency and a need to somehow approximate this mysterious Absolute State. However, as you remember, at that time, or, to be precise, at that non-time, no grounds existed on which such approximation could take place. In order to build such feasible grounds you need to have some orientation points or, better to say, you need to have some comparison between something entirely different from what you have and what is familiar to you in order to find out or to establish everything which is not integral to the nature of your current state and condition or your life in general.

As you remember, the issue was whether the sentient life is really positive; that is to say, is the currently (at that time or non-time) experienced life really positive? Does it really derive from something which is Absolute and to which that life relates from its relative condition? If no other condition exists, how do you define what is positive? Against what state are you able to determine that your life is really positive? What does the term ‘positive’ contain? If no other type of life exists against which you can compare and define the true nature of your current life, then isn’t it obvious that the term ‘positive’ in itself and by itself has no meaning or sense? How do you go about determining what is really positive and what is not so or such?

In order to answer this question, your first step in this respect is to classify the nature and content of life which you currently experience. Once you clearly establish all characteristics, traits, aspects, essence and substance of that life and everything else contained in that life; and once you determine that your life is something that derives from some kind of Absolute State, the nature of which you are incapable of grasping in an absolute sense, you embark on the exploration of some other possibilities which are not contained in anything that you have or experience at the current state and process of your life. This is your second step. In this step you need to find out and to define what is not contained or is not integral to your current life.

The question here is: Can something exist at all which is not contained in the nature of your current life and, consequently, by association, is not contained in that Absolute State which generated the currently available life? In your classification and definition of everything contained in your current life, you came to the conclusion that, if your current life derives from the Absolute State, to which you are relative and by which you live and are alive, then, by the logical construct of this setup, everything that you classified and defined must be contained in that Absolute State with the only difference that in that State all those established characteristics of your current life are of the Absolute Nature, whereas in you or in your current life they are of the relative nature. Thus, in essence, you are nothing else but a relative approximation of that Absolute Life or State. From this established fact you now have the relative knowledge what the Nature of that Absolute Life or Absolute State is. However, you still lack any degree of knowledge, first of all, how it is or what it is to be Absolute and, secondly, what would life be like if it were not derived from that Absolute State?

The issue here is, in its true essence and substance, the need to have some tangible comparison which would assure that your current life is really what you think it is and that it is not some kind of imposed factor about which you have no idea whether it is truly real or imaginary.

So, at this point in time, you can ask yourself the following question: If the current life, which you had already classified and defined as the life which approximates in its relative condition the Absolute Life and its Absolute State and Process, then what kind of life could it be which would move in the opposite direction, away from this particular approximation? How far could one go by moving away from It? Would this moving away continue infinitely, without ever stopping and reverting back on itself or returning to its originating point and subsequently ceasing to be and to exist? Or, at one point in time, would it exhaust all its possibilities and give a clear answer to the question that no other type of life is possible but only the one which originated in the Absolute Life and its Absolute State and Process? What would happen, for example, if this movement would continue indefinitely, to eternity? Would it mean that this other type of life is likewise Absolute? Can it be or is it really absolute?

The paradox of this assumption is obvious. How is it possible to predicate about anything which moves in the opposite direction and which, by its very nature did not originate in the Original Absolute Life, from which the current life stems or is derived, that it is Absolute if it has never existed in itself and by itself but occurred as a reaction and opposition to something which has always been in Itself and by Itself without any beginning and ending? On the other hand, what would happen if, by any chance, this opposite movement were to continue to eternity, never ever stopping or exhausting all its possibilities? In that case, how could it be defined or designated?

However, there is another point to this issue. Should such possibility be feasible — moving away to eternity — then you would have no choice in the matter but to also conclude that this type of life, which moves in the opposite direction from the approximation of the Absolute Life and its Absolute State and Process, originated in the Original Absolute Life as well. In this conclusion the paradox is obvious: If both lives, mutually exclusive and moving away from each other, originate in the same Absolute Source, then, by the logic of this setup, they would cancel each other; and not only that, but in that case, by the factor of mutual cancellation and ceasing to be and to exist, they would also cancel the Absolute Life Itself. If something like that were to happen, in that case, no Absolute Life could exist at all because if the Absolute Life, by the logical definition of its Absoluteness, is truly Absolute, it cannot have any beginning or ending.

Therefore, by the logic of such a conclusion, in this sense, no Absolute Truth, or anything Absolute, would exist likewise. In that case the only thing that would be and would exist is relative to the relative only. For that reason life, any life, would have to have a tangible and experiential beginning and ending. If it were to be so, then Creation would not be the State and Process of the Absolute Creator, but a freaky and unplanned accidental occurrence without any intelligent and thought-out process which, at one point in time, because of its accidental and incidental occurrence, would cease to be and to exist forever.

As you see from these hypothetical constructs, originally, the issue here was the search for the Absolute Truth. Because the only possible way to begin this search is by moving in the opposite direction from the relative approximation from It, — after all, you are incapable of deriving anything Absolute from your relative condition — you establish a lifestyle which doesn’t contain anything of that of which your current life consists.

What you have to understand in this respect, Peter, is that the issue here was to find out whether it is possible to establish a lifestyle which would, paradoxically speaking, approximate the Absolute but in the opposite direction — by moving away from it and not toward it. This was and is a fundamental difference between the positive state, defined above as the original life stemming from the Absolute, and the negative state, respectively, defined as a subsequent life which originated in the minds of the relative beings without any connection to the Absolute. Thus, as you see from this difference, whereas everyone in the positive state moves infinitely toward the approximation of the Absolute, everyone in the negative state wants to approximate It by moving away from It.

How do you accomplish such a negative approximation? The only way you can do it is by becoming more and more as not like anything which is in the positive state or in the original life. By this time, of course, you have already classified and defined all aspects, traits, characteristics and everything else about your original life. From the position of this classification and definition, you now begin to produce everything that is the exact opposite to anything which is contained in your original life. As you are moving more and more away from the Original Source of your life, you become more and more different in all respects and in all aspects of your new life from the original life that you had up to that point. As you are establishing this other type of life, by its opposing factor, you become aware what that other type of life is not and, at the same time, you become clearly aware what your new life is like. In this setup now you have established a condition which gives you a possibility for a clear comparison between these two types of life. Now you established a foundation on which you can distinguish between the nature of the original life, defined as the positive state, and the other type of life, defined as the negative state.

In the positive state, by the process of continuous approximation of the Absolute Life and Its State and Process, as you move closer and closer toward it, you become more and more as and like that Absolute Life — Me. If I am the Absolute Love and the Absolute Wisdom and all its infinitely numerous Derivatives, then everyone who approximates Me and comes closer to Me becomes more and more like Me, that is, more and more loving and wise, having more and more of their derivatives.

On the other hand, in the negative state, by the process of continuous reversed approximation of My Absolute Life and all Its States and Processes, as you move more and more away from Me, in your search for everything that is not of Me and of My Absolute State and Process, in order to find out if it is possible to know anything different than that which is contained in Me, you become less and less like Me. And not only that but by opposing everything contained in Me and My positive state, you become more and more of that which is not contained in Me and My positive state.

So, if I am the Absolute Unconditional Love and Absolute Wisdom, the farther away you move in the opposite direction from Me, the more unloving and unwise you become. If I am the Absolute Good and Truth then, by the reversed approximation, you become more and more evil and false. And because all infinitely numerous derivatives of My Absolute Unconditional Love and Absolute Wisdom are of My Absolutely Positive Nature, as you move farther away from Me, in your evil and false lifestyle, you will reversibly approximate them so that all derivatives of your evils and falsities will become more and more negative to the point that they will be coming closer and closer to everything opposite which is contained in My True Nature.

Thus, in this sense, you may say that the more away you are from Me and My positive state, the less and less you will be as and like I am and the less and less you will have of that which is contained in My positive state.

And this brings us to the answer to your question, Peter. Basically, you can say that one of the many issues for the pseudo-creators was to find out how far they can go in becoming negative or as and like I am not and My positive state is not. Again, the question was: Is it possible at all that by the process of reversed approximation of My Absolute Life, a point could never be reached at which point their becoming more and more negative would exhaust all its possibilities and there would be nothing else after that point which would enable them to become even more negative, evil and false? If they could reach such a point, then it would prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that anything originated in the relative condition, cannot have life in itself and by itself and therefore, it could never be absolute or of the absolute. In that case, by the logic of this factor, the opposite must be true — all life must originate in the Absolute State — Me, in order to have no ending and no exhaustion of its usefulness and creativity. And this is the Absolute Truth.

So, as the pseudo-creators, by their own design, were becoming more and more negative, for the purpose of testing their hypothesis, as outlined above, they generated more and more characteristics which in My New Revelation were designated as possibly the most evil, putrid, despicable and by similar adverse traits. In this respect they went as far as they were capable of. At the present time, they are finding themselves at a dead end, recognizing the fact that anything originating in the relative condition, without any relevance to anything Absolute, has no permanency, no continuation, no possibilities, no true creativity and no nothing (two negatives, please!).

Because of this factor and because, originally, the purpose of their becoming that way was solely for the establishment of that which is not of the Absolute and which is not true, and thus, obliquely, coming to the conclusion that Absolute Truth really exists, in order to reflect this situation with them, it was necessary to look at them in the Corollaries… and these Dialogs not as being your adversaries but allies in the search for the real truth. After all, all your lives, you all have been searching for this Truth — Me.

Before that, before the transcending understanding of the needs for the activation of the negative state, it was vitally necessary for you to acquire a proper knowledge about the genesis and nature of the negative state in all aspects of its abominable state and condition. Without such knowledge, you could never come to proper conclusions about its meaning, purpose and nature. In that case, not properly knowing about it and why it was permitted by Me to be activated, you would remain in distortions and falsities not only about the negative state but also about the positive state and My True Nature. For that reason, it was necessary first to show you the true face of the negative state in all its aspects, before anything else could be revealed in this respect. And because the pseudo-creators were the ones who agreed to become the embodiment of all and every abomination and putridity of the negative state, it was necessary to describe them and their deeds in such adverse terms and concepts.

However, at the present time, during the currently ongoing shift, as well as from the time Update 20 was recorded by you, Peter, the situation has fundamentally changed. As mentioned many times before, absolutely nothing is the same. The present situation in all worlds and universes, that is to say, in the multiverse, as well as in the Zone of Displacement and on your planet, requires that the real reasons for the permission of the activation of the negative state and for the true nature, position and role of the pseudo-creators in all of this be revealed and accepted by all of you who read these words.

It is vital and crucial that, as My true representatives, you know the real truth behind all of this. Only with the truth in your minds and hands, symbolically speaking, will you be able to effectively survive in what is to come and to fulfill your mission to the satisfaction of all.

Peter: Thank You very much for this exquisite elaboration and revelation. Is there anything else You would like to contribute today?

The Lord Jesus Christ: You are welcome, Peter. The content of this Dialog is somewhat difficult. For that reason, I would postpone saying anything else until the opportune time. Intuitively, you will know when. In the meantime, have a marvelous time with My Czech and Slovak people. And now, go on the balcony and sunbathe for a while.

NINETY FIRST DIALOGUE

Source: DIALOGUES WITH THE LORD JESUS ​​CHRIST PART 1.


PRINTER FRIENDLY, PDF AND EMAIL

INTRODUCTION | SPIRITUALITY | CONTACTS | MAIN SITEMAP | BACK