|
|
|
August 2, 1999, in Prague, Czech Republic
Peter: This morning I would like to continue in presenting for Your
consideration questions asked during my visits in Slovakia and the
Czech Republic, if I may. However, before formulating these questions,
perhaps You would like to discuss some other spiritual or practical, or
whatever, issues that need to be brought to our attention.
The Lord Jesus Christ: Thank you, Peter, for asking Me to talk first.
Of course, you may continue in asking questions on behalf of those who
presented them for My consideration. However, before going into that,
something else needs to be reminded or brought to your attention.
As you remember from one of the previous Dialogs, it was indicated to
you all that during this phase of the ongoing shift, it is vital and crucial
to reevaluate and redefine all concepts, ideas, words, and expressions
commonly and uncommonly used by all of you. It is not that much that
you need to replace their old or current meaning as to realize that they
do contain something else besides what you thought they meant or
signified up to this point. In the previous Dialogs, we have already
redefined some of the most common expressions and words used in your
language.
Today I would like to bring to your attention some other words that you
use so often in your daily expressions and during the reading of My New
Revelation. Because in the previous Dialog the question was about three
words by which I am Named and why I am Named by these three words
— The Lord Jesus Christ — it is necessary to acquire a transcending
understanding what they really mean and signify.
There are several positions in the multiverse, as well as in the Zone of
Displacement and on planet Zero, from which these three words are
apprehended and have a subsequent impact on all in My Creation, in the
pseudo-creation and on planet Zero. Not all aspects of these positions
could be grasped by the human mind or by any relative sentient mind.
They are of the Absolute Nature. However, this Absolute Nature can be
approximated by the relative sentient mind.
Each particular word in this triad has relevance to the two levels of its
significance. One relates to all sentient beings everywhere and
everywhen and the other relates to Me personally and to My Absolute
Nature.
In relationship to all sentient beings, the word “Lord,” among many other
things, denotes One Absolute Fundamental Principle by which and
through which any life is possible and feasible. It signifies the fact that
any life at all, no matter of what type or non-type, is grounded and
anchored in this One Absolute Principle. By it and through it everything
and everyone is unified and has its own meaning and place in being and
existence, as well as in pseudo-being and pseudo-existence and on planet
Zero. In relationship to Me personally the word “Lord” signifies the
Absolute Oneness of Godhood that has no beginning and ending and that
is of non-time and non-space and is not only present in non-time and
non-space but makes any such states and processes, or anything else for
that matter, possible. It is something that in its true nature is
incomprehensible and cannot be named by any human or non-human
words, ideas, symbols and expressions.
The word “Jesus,” in relationship to all sentient beings, among many
other things, signifies the beginning and ending of each cycle of time and
a permanent positioning, in the progressive mode, of all sentient beings
at various levels, degrees, steps, dimensions, etc., of the entire
multiverse, the Zone of Displacement and planet Zero. It also enables the
being and existence of uniqueness, individualization and personalization
of each and every living and breathing entity everywhere and
everywhen. In relationship to Me personally, the word “Jesus,” among
many other significant things, denotes My personal and unique presence
in each and every individual, or, better to say, that each and every
individual, by being such an individual from My unique element, by
which that individual is what he/she is, is present in Me and I in
him/her. Thus, in this sense, the word “Jesus” also means that all are in
Me and I am in them. Because all are in Me, I am the only One who
Always Absolutely Is in Myself and by Myself.
The word “Christ,” in relationship to all sentient entities, among many
other most significant things, means the very ability of being sentient or
being someone who comprehends, understands and is able to know. The
ability to know and self-know or sentiency itself is enabled by that which
is contained in the word “Christ.” In this sense, you can conceptualize it
as the beginning and ending of all and every knowledge and, most
importantly, the knowledge of self. The knowledge of self is the
foundation on which all other knowledge is possible and conceivable. In
relationship to Me personally, the word “Christ,” among many other
things, signifies that I am the only One Who Truly Knows. In this sense,
you can say that I am the Knowledge in Myself and by Myself. If I were
not to be and to exist, no Knowledge would be and exist as well. I AM
WHO I AM and there is none besides Me. This is what the word “Christ”
in relationship to Me truly signifies or denotes.
Now, from the position of the Absolute, as indicated in the previous
Dialog (92), these three words are in the state and process of One
Singular Absolute Idea. They are in the condition of absolute unification,
integration and oneness. They are not perceived as something disjointed
or separated or different from one another or disunited. However, from
the position of any relative sentient mind, the need to emphasize these
three most important aspects of this Absolute Oneness, in order that
these words enter their minds on the level of their relativity, they need to
be split into the three words, which are able to convey or to evoke the
proper perception and meaning of their true reality. Subsequently, as
anyone is repeating these three words, by the process of their mystical
power, they place everyone who says them, not only in the reality of their
own individualized and personalized being and existence but, most
importantly, into Me, and, at the very same time, receiving Me into
themselves. By this process, they are able to sustain their sentiency and
their own reality rooted in their “I am.”
From these facts, it is obvious why the need for the three words exists
and why you should continue to use all three words — The Lord Jesus
Christ — at all times during your stay on planet Zero and elsewhere.
And this is all that needs to be revealed about this issue at this time.
You may go ahead, Peter, and ask the mentioned questions.
Peter: Thank You very much for this explanation. In actuality, the first
question, which was posed by Ján Béreš of Slovakia, has a direct
relevance to the above-discussed issue. It can be formulated as follows: If
You are Absolute and if You Are and Have Absolute Knowledge of
everything and everyone, and if that Knowledge is not space-time bound
but is of a non-temporal and non-spatial nature; and if that Absolute
Knowledge really contains everything at all; and if, in an ultimate sense
everyone is in You and You in them, then, in that case, it would also
contain everything of the negative state and its nature. And yet, by the
logic of the nature of the Absolute, if that Absolute is of the Absolute
Positiveness, then, in that case, it cannot contain anything of the
negative nature or have anything negative within itself. How do you
reconcile this paradox?
The Lord Jesus Christ: The answer to this question should be obvious
from everything contained in My New Revelation. You have to
distinguish between something that is absolutely positive and that which
is relative to that positive. In the initial setup, everything is positive in
its nature. As you know, the One Who is Absolutely Positive has the only
recourse or ability to define what is really positive. Once you define in
relative terms what positive really is, in order for the relative mind to
understand what it means to be positive, you also have to define what
positive is not. It is not that much that you have to concretely define
what it is or how it looks like or feels like to be something else but
positive; but it is more like defining precisely what it is to be positive and
exclude everything else by the simple logical factor that it doesn’t exist.
The logical conclusion in this respect is that everything which doesn’t
exist and therefore, is not contained in that which was defined as
positive, cannot be positive. Otherwise, it would be contained in that
positive.
Now, when the relative sentient mind, as it was relatively separated
from My Absolute State for the purpose of establishment of its own
independent, free and choice-making state and process, searched for that
which was not contained in that Absolutely Positive, by the factor of
definition of that positiveness, and by the factor of knowledge that
anything at all which was not contained in it, must be something else;
but that it also is defined by that Absolutely Positive, it established a
lifestyle that became the negative state.
Because in an ultimate sense, this negative state is derived from the
relative condition, even though its definition is established from the
original definition of what the positive state is, by the factor of what it is
not, and by the factor of that One Who defines what the positive state is
and is not, that One has also the absolute knowledge of what the nature
of the negative state is. To have such knowledge does not mean to be in
that which that knowledge describes.
You have to distinguish here between having something, experiencing
something and being an initiator or originator of something. The
Absolute State knows everything about everything, including about that
which is of the relative nature. However, to have this knowledge, doesn’t
mean to be an initiator or originator or container of that which is the
subject of that knowledge.
As you know, in order for the negative state to be initiated, its
originators needed to separate themselves from Me, thus, effectively,
turning away from Me by no longer facing Me. In a symbolical way, you
may say that they went behind Me (go behind Me, Satan!). If they were
to continue to face Me, in no way could they initiate the negative state.
To face Someone who is Absolutely Positive, precludes existence of
anything else but something which is positive and of that positive.
During the process of this separation, the initiators of the negative state
excluded themselves from being in Me. However, I still remained in them
— otherwise they could not live — but now turned away from facing
them or being in the back of them where they couldn’t see Me or discern
My presence and where I was not influenced by their deeds. Because
they positioned themselves in the back of Me, and because I could not
face them face to face, whatever they were fabricating, it eluded My
direct perception and influence, thus, making such fabrications possible
to become their own pseudo-reality. It is said that their fabrications
eluded My direct perception and influence. The reason for this statement
is in the fact that My presence in them — in their ability to choose and to
change — was aware of everything that they were doing without any
interference or preventive measures from doing whatever they were
doing at that time. The position and direction of that presence in them
was such that it would not allow Me or give Me an opportunity to prevent
the activation of the negative state. As you know, from the position of My
Absolute Freedom, I could not impose on them anything contrary to their
asking for My intervention.
However, there is another important issue in this respect. It relates to
something which was described in the Law of Spiritual Reality (Chapter
10 in The New Revelation of The Lord Jesus Christ). As you
remember from the content of that Law, in actuality and factuality, there
is only one reality — the reality of My positive state which derives from
the Absolute Reality of My Being and Existence. In this sense, My
Absolute Reality is the only true being and existence, which enables the
being and existence of anything else. Because of this fact, the so-called
reality of the negative state is, in fact, non-reality and in the true reality
it doesn’t exist. As you remember from the previous Dialogs, it was
indicated there that the negative state has an appearance of reality but
not the true reality. Because of this appearance, it is only an illusion
which cannot be registered in the true perceptive and self-perceptive
spectrum of the genuine being and existence. Due to the fact that,
symbolically speaking, the negative state, and everything it contains, is
behind Me, it cannot enter Me or My Absolute Reality. For that reason,
from the position of the Absoluteness of My Absolute Positiveness, in My
Absolute Perceptive, Impressive and Receptive Realization, it doesn’t
exist either. Anything that is derived from the relative state, and thus, is
relative to the relative only and, thus, by its nature is transient and
temporary, cannot be contained in anything Absolutely Positive.
Therefore, in this state, for all practical purposes, it doesn’t exist, or, at
least it cannot be registered in anything which contains the only true
reality.
The problem with this situation about the negative state is or was that,
in this condition, because the negative state is or was behind Me, without
My presence in its pseudo-reality or non-reality, nothing could be done
about its appearances and the way its illusion impinges itself on the
perception of those who believe it to be the true reality. If you believe in
your illusions as having their own reality, it will appear that way to you
and you would not consider it anything else but the true reality.
This situation created a considerable problem for everyone in being and
existence as well as in the pseudo-being and pseudo-existence. The
problem in this respect is that if the negative state cannot be contained
or be perceived as the true reality in My Absolute State, and if the
negative state is behind Me, then, in that case, I am unable to do
anything about its elimination. In order to eliminate something, you
have to assume that it is real. Otherwise, there is no need for such an
elimination. After all, if the negative state is not a part of My Absolute
Reality, and if, for all practical purposes, it doesn’t exist in any true
reality, then, logically speaking, there is nothing to eliminate.
So, how do you go about rectifying this situation? You have no recourse
but to enter that pseudo-reality and illusion of reality and clothe yourself
with its appearances. By that factor, for that moment, in its own sphere,
it does become real and tangible. Now you can grasp what it is all about
and include it in your perceptive spectrum so that it becomes registered
in your full awareness not as something theoretical or hypothetical but
experiential and realizable, and something that has impact on your life.
From that position, you can now do something about removal of this
illusion that plagues the sentient mind, trying its worst to convince it
that it is real or that it has the only true reality.
This is the reason why I Myself had to enter the negative state, via
human life, and experience all its aspects and all its illusions and
insanity and everything else it contained in its illusional and delusional
non-reality. As you know, during My stay on your planet and in the Zone
of Displacement, the major effort of all rulers and inhabitants of this
illusional world, was to convince Me, through all kinds of temptations,
that the negative state is as real or even more so than the positive state.
If I were to acknowledge the negative state’s pseudo-reality and its
illusion as the true reality and the true being and existence, by the fact
that My acknowledgement would be coming from My Absolute State as
the only Absolute Reality, I would turn the negative state into the true
reality. In that case, I would have to admit it into Myself and internalize
it. What would happen in that case? In the terms of your physics, it
would be like combining matter and anti-matter in one container. Such a
combination would end in a spectacular explosion that would annihilate
not only the negative state but also the positive state and My Own
Absoluteness. As a result, the entire Creation would cease to be and to
exist as well. Such an ending would be inconceivable, impossible and
inconsistent with My True Nature.
From everything that was said about this problem and about My
Absolute Knowledge of everything that is and is not, because of the
seeming reality of the negative state, and because of its non-reality,
originally, it could not be registered in My Absolute Reality. Thus, in
human terms, you can say that the pseudo-being and pseudo-existence of
the negative state, at the time before its activation, didn’t enter My
Mind.
Do you remember My statement recorded in one of the prophets in the
Bible (prophet Jeremiah) when I was rebuking the children of Israel
about their coming up with some abominable practices that had never
entered My Mind? At that time, they were practicing human sacrifices to
the demons. What do you think the mentioned Biblical text was all
about? It was describing the fact that the negative state, represented
here by the demons and the children of Israel, had never entered My
Mind and that I had never conceived or had in Me anything related to
the activation and establishment of the negative state. How can anything
that is only an illusion be initiated in something that has the only
Absolute Reality? From true reality nothing of unreality can be derived.
It doesn’t enter the Absolute Sentient Mind which is the only true
reality. By its nature, this Mind does not contain anything even remotely
related to anything of the illusional and unreal nature.
However, in the relative sentient mind, because of its inability to grasp
the fullness and completeness of the Absolute State, and because of its
needs to understand what the true reality is all about, it may and can
initiate something that is not of the true reality. From the position of the
relative condition, the only way to understand what the true reality is all
about, is by the oblique way through establishing of something which is
not real. This gives the relative sentient mind an ability to compare that
which is real to that which, in its essence and substance, is unreal. A
better way to say it, in its non-essence and non-substance, is it is unreal.
The reason for this oblique way of coming up with the right conclusions
about anything is in the fact that the relative sentient mind cannot take
any position which would enable it to perceive everything from the
Absolute State. For that reason, it has to arrive at any conclusions by
comparing something which is true with something which is not so. In
this case, by comparing what is real with that which is unreal. The
process of the establishment of this non-reality and its actual realization,
in order to succeed, must always happen outside of the Absolute Sentient
Mind. Otherwise, it could not happen. Thus, the statement, ‘it has never
entered My Mind.’
Peter: Thank You very much for this explanation. Should I continue in
presenting for Your consideration some other questions or should we
postpone them to some other time?
The Lord Jesus Christ: You are welcome, Peter. My recommendation
would be to postpone it to some other time. This Dialog is also a difficult
one. As you noticed from today’s work, you had to interrupt the recording
of this Dialog several times because of visitors and other things which
needed to be taken care of. So, go in peace and we’ll resume our Dialogs
in a more opportune time. You’ll know when.
Source: DIALOGUES WITH THE LORD JESUS CHRIST PART 1.